A “Patent Pending” is virtually useless as a defence of a company’s “innovation”. Its more likely to be :-
a) - A marketing ploy, a claim in the marketplace…
b) - An attempt to bolster the perceived worth of a company in the eyes of potential investors… ( Same as “a” in a sense…)
The actual patent can take up to 18 months to pass, and frequently these applications fail;- often because there is a demonstrable history of the use of the tech or idea by a person or persons prior to the acceptance of a patent. An actual patent is absurdly expensive to upkeep.
Someone better hope to gain a massive market share just to make the payments worth making.
There are means to object to patent applications. A department of the Aust. government called “IP Australia” has been established which has a system to assist inventors and innovators whose employers or competitors have applied for patent without consent. As of 1997, any employer who utilises an employee’s invention must obtain written permission to do so.
An interested party is able to access the details of applications, via IP Aust.
I did carbon rails in 2002…yes, on EPS…I’m sure there are others. The only way I can see a patent being taken by the party in question is in relation to the technique of applying the carbon to a rail, not the simple fact of carbon rails. Even then, the many ways to skin a cat means the change to the tech would be minimal to circumvent a patent.
A patent on a way of doing it, yes, the finished product, no…
I’d be wary of patents, If I could even go there…because…If no-one else is able to make the a similar item, then the validation of that concept is driven only by one owners ability to market it and prove it in the marketplace, rather than by widespread acceptance. Thats a lot of magazine space and an uphill battle in the mainstream - It better be a damn good product or well backed by hype if you want to push it as yours and yours alone. I.e - If Simon had patented the thruster, it may have died along with his old label “Energy” and not for lack of merit, but Simon had the combined push of dozens of convert manufacturers.
Josh