glassed on fins

my  buddy  gave  me  a  old  ed  wright  fish  to  work  on, some how  a  keel  had   been  ripped  off. when i  inspected how  they  were  mounted it  seems  as  though  they  only  used some  fin  rope  and  built  up  the  base  with  sanding  coat.  seeing as  the  original fin  is missing  i  have  to  replace both  of  them and  i’m  weary of  the  strength  they  would  have  if  i  mounted them  the same  way.  at  the  same time  i’m not  sure  how  confident i  would  be  to  sand  down a huge  portion  of  the  tail to  the  cloth  so  i  can  mount  them with  layerd  cloth. what do  you  guys  think?

[quote="$1"]

....i  can  mount  them with  layerd  cloth. what do  you  guys  think?

[/quote]

In 1960 I abandoned the use of rope or roving when mounting fins.     I used cloth only.   Never cracked or broke a fin loose after that.    I used 5 or 6 layers of either 8 or 10 ounce cloth.     The SECRET to the high strength, (shhhhh) is to cut the cloth with weave on a 45/45 bias.   Remember, it's a secret.

EDIT:   That would be 5 or 6 layers of cloth on EACH SIDE OF THE FIN.

thanks  for the  tip.  cant  belive  i  never thought of that  myself.

[quote="$1"]

[quote="$1"]

....i  can  mount  them with  layerd  cloth. what do  you  guys  think?

[/quote]

In 1960 I abandoned the use of rope or roving when mounting fins.     I used cloth only.   Never cracked or broke a fin loose after that.    I used 5 or 6 layers of either 8 or 10 ounce cloth.     The SECRET to the high strength, (shhhhh) is to cut the cloth with weave on a 45/45 bias.   Remember, it's a secret.

EDIT:   That would be 5 or 6 layers of cloth on EACH SIDE OF THE FIN.

[/quote]

 

Bill, Bill , Bill............

6 layers of cloth on each side....8-10 oz cloth??????

.....yeah... no wonder they never broke.....sanding nightmare.....Super strong.......

Sorry pal.......that's way OverKill....Thraikill...

A nice bead of roving or fin rope about the size of your little pinky finger......lay it up nice and tight next to the fin...2 layers of 6 oz from the top of the fin to about 2 inches toward the stringer..........work it out.....use your fingers....

look for a little book......The Ding Repair Scriptures , by George Colendich.....It's all in the book...Foamez has the book...

so simple even a hippy can do it.....Buy the book...it's the best 12 dollars I've ever spent on surfing......

Glass ons are easy...........

 

Ray

 

[quote="$1"]

[quote="$1"]

[quote="$1"]

....i  can  mount  them with  layerd  cloth. what do  you  guys  think?

[/quote]

In 1960 I abandoned the use of rope or roving when mounting fins.     I used cloth only.   Never cracked or broke a fin loose after that.    I used 5 or 6 layers of either 8 or 10 ounce cloth.     The SECRET to the high strength, (shhhhh) is to cut the cloth with weave on a 45/45 bias.   Remember, it's a secret.

EDIT:   That would be 5 or 6 layers of cloth on EACH SIDE OF THE FIN.

[/quote]

Sorry pal.......that's way OverKill....

[/quote]

Ray, Ray, Ray,

Wrong.   It was a time of thirty pound boards, with NO leashes.    It was adequate and appropriate to the circumstances.  Sanding was easy.   It's all in how clean you do the layup.    If you make a sloppy mess, it might well be a nightmare to sand.   I didn't have that problem.   Don't be sorry pal, pay attention and learn something.   The cloth only method is not efficient in a ''production'' setting, but it IS the best/strongest way to attach a glass-on fin.   There are other benefits to the method that I'm not discussing here, that relate to performance.   I answered the narrow question that was asked.

B.T., I see a book in the details. Could help with retirement.

actually  my  question was  more  along the  lines  of , with  a  4"  keel do you  think some  rope  and  a  solid  buildup would  be  adequate.  or  should  i take the  time  to  sand  all  the  filler  off  and  use  cloth , which  would  not  look  original. i  understand exactly  where  bill  is  coming  from. prodution  wise  fin rope  is  great  but  i  believe  in  theory  the  base  of  the fin is   where  the most  drag  is.  boxed  fins  don’t have  that  buildup. some people  will  never  be  good enough  surfers  to  ever  notice  the  difference and  if  you are  good  enough  it  won’t  matter anyhow  because  you  still  know  how  to  make  the  board  do  what  you  want.i  dont  know  about  6  layers  of  8oz. but  i use  4  layers  of  6oz and  have  been  quite  succesful.

[quote="$1"]

i  dont  know  about  6  layers  of  8oz. but  i use  4  layers  of  6oz and  have  been  quite  succesful.

[/quote]

The schedule I referenced, was what I used on 8 and 9 inch  D fins, and Reverse fins,  ''back in the day,'' as they say.    Smaller fins don't require as much cloth,  and these days with leashes, boards don't wash up on shore like they did in the past.

i am part  of  the  anti  leash  movement and i  like to  glass  on  all  my  fins  and  never put  anything to  attach  a  leash  to  on  my  boards. i  guess  you  could  almost  say  i  have  influenced a  good  group  of   kids  in  my  area  to  lose  the  leash  and  switch  to  single  fins. i  believe   some  things  have  advanced  in  surfboards  and  some  things  just  need  to  be  done the  old fashioned  way.

If you check around on used boards with glassed on (or plug-style) fins, it's actually pretty rare to find one that hasn't been repaired or damaged.

After losing a glassed-on side fin during a bottom turn once, I took to building up the fillet with plenty of bias cut cloth.  Sometimes I shred a few pieces and place the strands against the joint under the bias cut patches.  I often use 10 layers per side - not all the way up the fin but along the base.

Fins are already a vulnerable weak spot on a board.  To add a few layers of cloth during installation is cheap and easy insurance. 

Funny.funny, funny ,

I was waiting for a good response from Bill....I think Bill knows I was poking a little fun at him...I'm OK with what Bill and John are  talking about. Lots of layers, taper the layers.Think about laying up the cloth so that the weave goes at 45 degeee  angles ,ect.......Good stuff for super tankers

 

But......

I'm talking about glass on's for Fish and Thrusters....the side fins are so close to the rail there's no way to do Bill's method without changing the shape of the rail....Here's a photo of a short board I just finished.  You can get some cool glass ons from ProBoxLarry.....

Have fun everyone!

 

Ray

Thanks John and Bill!

I hate freaking fin rope! I have been surfing 11" upright pivot fins on all my longboards and have snapped a few off using fin rope and 2-3 layers of 6oz cloth on each side. I glassed on a fin today with 4- 6oz layers staggered at different lengths tapering up the fin per side. Tomorrow I will work 2 more 6 oz layers 3/4's up the fin and 2 more totally covering the fin (per side). Thanks for the tip!  11" fins put a lot of torque around the base with surfing hard in over head surf. I have always read and heard the gospel about fin rope, but it doesn’t make sense to me on longboards with big fins.. Layers do. For shortboards with multiple fins near the rail it makes alot of sense.

 

Sometimes things happen for a reason. Sometimes you have to go with it.....I shaped a 9'3" longboard. No customer , no dead lines, No fin plans....Surf4fins shows up with a fin he found at SanO 15 years ago.....Looks like I'm going for a little old school fin lay up!

 

Ray....Ray...Ray...

I'll bring over a thruster that I did using Bills no roving method.  My lam is full of bubbles, and looks like hell; however it will give you an idea of how the method works.  There is no fillet, and the fins are super solid on the board.  You don't need as many layers as Bill said to use with a smaller fin.  I used 4 oz glass.   

Hi Ray -

"Surf4fins shows up with a fin he found at SanO 15 years ago....."

The board I lost the fin on was an 8'4" thruster style semi-gun.   It wasn't a huge wave or anything but I took a beating when it broke free. 

The guy who built the board that lost the fin that Tim found should have used more glass.  LOL