Monocoque effect? But I don’t quite buy into the this ensuring the same defection on both sides. There are several reasons for this, Bert Burgers morph theory, Bert/Greg Loehr bottom trampoline theory and because of the compund curves load may be distributed in a non uniform way. Not claiming that my model is accurate, but more a proof of concept. But consider the extreme case of a hollow board with a standard laminate, is it unlikely that the thickness will change when flexing? As foams get lighter, it’s approaching the extreme case. Whether or not this plays a significant role for the flex of a board is a different question which I think can only be solved by trials and/or a computer simulation. However there seems to be consensus in the compsand crew that a lightweight core (1 lbs. EPS) is what is needed to get the much sought after magic flex
I agree, the EPS does not compress in a constant way, it’s more like an exponential spring? However, the 9 psi EPS rating is at 10% deformation which is quite substantial, however unless we know the pressure on the core from a flexing skin it really means nothing.
True, but the concept remains the same, the thickness would still change.