Low Rocker Numbers

No. It was an old school midlength ecotech blank that came with low rocker :slight_smile:

Yeah, I’m frugal, I try get the max length I can from blanks.

I’m also over the low nose rocker boards. More nose rocker is better.

 

My idea of low rocker in a mid length would be 3.25 nose and 1.75-2 tail. I’m just starting to make more mids, generally I’m over 9-6 or under 6-6. The few that I have made all incorporated belly in the nose to slight concave to v out the tail and are single fins. The concave in the mid actually lessens the stringer/middle rocker  of the board. The belly in the nose helps with pearling and chop and the v in the tail lets the board go from rail to rail easier. Belly and v also create more rail rocker to give the board a more curved rail rocket allowing it to fit a steeper wave/not dig rail or get too tracky…

What you are talking about for a mid-length(especially a traditional Egg) is reasonable.  Bottom contours or rocker.