Y’know, as Sundance also said…
“Y’think you used enough dynamite, there, Butch??”
When I run into something that is driving me bughouse and I just can’t find an answer and I’m slowly drilling myself into a hole in the ground, it’s been my experience that I’m looking at it the wrong way. Or,
‘Doc, you IDIOT - don’t raise the bridge, lower the river’ - take another look at the problem and try a very different approach -
Lets take another look at what we’re dealing with here:
Given a very crude drawing of an outline shape, this or a variation is what you’re looking to wind up with. But you’re whittling the blank into four pieces that will want to slip sideways, get longer and deform and lots of nasty little pieces of wood that want to go sproing and fit wrong and every other damn thing.
What’s wrong with this picture and this approach? I’ll show ya -
Cut like this first
Lay in your stringer, glued up, clamp it. Instead of four slippery slidey pieces of foam ( or more) , you have two. Instead of lots of nasty little pieces of wood, you have one. Relatively easy to clamp too. When that’s done it’s thing, repeat for the other side, mirror image. You’re done. Yeah, you got two separate glueups, not one. Yeah, you sliced right through the center stringer…in this example. Don’t have to, you can do it like this one below, just means you gotta use two pieces of wood- , clamping and fitting and all is still relatively easy. Either way, you have a pretty big, stiff piece of foam that isn’t gonna want to get longer or deform much, it’ll hold the other piece pretty much where it wants to be.
Awright, that’s my take on it anyhow.
Don’t raise the bridge…
doc…