Some Notes on the ‘other’ value(s) of foil
In general, foiling is provides a degree of rigidity to fins, which is not there for flat or unfoiled fins. Simply rounded the leading edge, in order to achieve some degree of streamlining, has the added bonus of providing an extra bit of rigidity.
For those who enjoy drawing directly from Nature for inspiration, consider the fins of fish v aquatic mammals. Fish tend to use bones to support there fins, whereas, because their evolution was different, aquatic mammals tend to use other mechanisms, in addition to bone (but even then, quite differently from those of fish), to achieve a similar degree of rigidity in their fins. That is, they [aquatic mammals] would appear, in general, to rely more heavily on foil as a structural element in design. This being particularly true for dorsal and lateral fins. Yes, foiling is used in general, if only to streamline, however, the exact nature of its dynamic application, aside from structure would appear to vary significantly, even for creatures that move at comparable speeds and subject to comparable accelerations
In general, I don’t doubt the value of foil, it is at once offers a unique mechanical solution to providing rigidity to a structure, and at the same time offers the general benefit of streamlining. That it may than be used in other ways is also likely to be true, for both fish and aquatic mammals, and marine architects … and it would appear surfers.
Where does its application with regards to structure end and the secondary benefits begin? I don’t know. The question for me is that of its application in surfing. It has already been stated that surfers don’t go straight a lot, this being particularly true for current state of the sport. For me, this is a reasonable departure point.
kc