Yes, they all surf. But are still in the “beggining” stage.
I like the idea of a budget, but then I don’t want to Limit the creativity.
Ben in your jesting you actually gave me an idea. They might be able to get material companys to sponsor thier
projects and donate materials.
At this point I am thinking of dividing it up into stages:
a. design
b. shaping
c. artwork (unless they want to do tinted/swirled resin)
d. glassing
e. testing. To include trying eachothers boards and comparing.
Not that there is anything wrong with just picking a board, but the problem I am really stuck on is giving a purpose to which board they pick. All the other stages are somewhat absolute in nature. The board is either shaped or not. But the design phase is quite arbitrary. I wouldn’t want to squelch any creativity, after all Ben, one of them might be the next Greenough, but I also don’t want them to try and build something that is unridable and will just end up in their closet or worse yet in the dumpster. I guess I could have them do a proposal of the design with the reasons they chose it. The concept would not only include the shape of the board but it’s intended construction technique. i.e. bagged lam or hand lam, poly or epoxy, artwork concepts etc. Each of the above stages would be given a time limit (2-3 weeks),
Their grade would not be affected so much by quality as by sticking to the concept and timeline. The idea is to use the whole process to teach them a few valuable life skills/lessons, i.e. finishing what you start, staying within a budget, dealing with deadlines, making proposals, to name a few. I dam not really into the A,B,C,D,F grading scale. We have always done it like this; If there is a wrong answer, say in thier math, we just go over it again until they get it all correct. That is why I thought of including all you Swaylockians. They could propose the concept here. You all may not like what they propose, in which case I don’t give a… er I mean, That part would not necessarily be open for discussion. Although we would still be open to an “glaring fault” if some one happened to point it out.