A glass IN single fin ....

Would anyone have an idea roughly what year a fin like this would be ? [My guess is somewhere between 1969-72 maybe ? Although , not having the hole for a legrope to go through , perhaps it was later ?]

cheers

ben

… unfortunately the guy I got it off threw the board away , so I couldn’t check for a legrope plug , and also , he wasn’t sure how big the board would have been [pieces were missing , evidently !]

…it’s 8 3/4" deep , with a 6 1/4" base , if that helps …

here it is alongside a thruster back finbox fin …

Quote:

Would anyone have an idea roughly what year a fin like this would be ? [My guess is somewhere between 1969-72 maybe ? Although , not having the hole for a legrope to go through , perhaps it was later ?]

cheers

ben

That’s a tough one. I recall seeing similar fins in 1968-1969 on the East Coast US when the wide-tailed deep V-bottoms made their appearance (e.g, Con Iron Butterfly). However, those were somewhat deeper, all molded poly, I don’t recall any lay-ups or glass-ons. The closest match shown in Stoked-n-Board is a 1968-1970 Greenough Stage 3, but that was at 11-1/4" deep. 9-1/2" base, and in ABS for WAVESET. I don’t recall that leg ropes were yet in use here at that time.

-Samiam

Sorta smells like late 1967, or 1968. Actually reminds me of the fin John Kelly was using on his ‘‘Hydro’’ model boards of that era.

I wonder if it was not reshaped by the owner from something bigger. What makes me say so is the approximative foil. It doesn’t look like a pro job.

Because of the short length of the base of the fin, I’m certain the shape is the original design, and not cut down from a larger fin. Many larger fins WERE cut down, when higher aspect ratio fins began to appear, and proved to be superior to the standard D type fins of the day.

thanks for the replies , guys !

…it sounds like it was a pre-legrope , ‘transition period’ board’s fin then , from what you dated it to be.

[now I’m wishing he had kept the board , too [no matter HOW butchered it may have been]

cheers



 ben

yeah my first thought was a re-shape too, bill is right though the base is fairly short so it wasn’t a D-fin but possibly a greenough or similar?

if it IS infact the original shape, you are correct in saying that it’s not a great job!