Maybe everybody should refocus on what we all want out of blanks and blank companies versus who has the best toilet paper in their bathrooms, so to speak. You might like those big giant rolls while it doesn’t fit on my roller.
The guys that are focused on making a living are well advised to look at numerous factors; shapeability, deliver, rpice stability, cell structure for consistency, painting, compression, density below the skin, machining capability, weight, pukas, gassing, sensitivity to heat, flexural characteristics, stringer quality (straightness, rocker accuracy, blunting of tools from wood) etc. .
I don’t think any of us can absolutely state there is only one company out there that fits every single criteria that clearly makes them head over heels better than everyone else.
However, there are certain things that currently are self evident. The foamers making blanks that can’t withstand a hot day on the beach w/out problems…or having to treat your surfboard like it is an ice cream…should be nixed off the list entirely.
The blanks that gas after you have put all the time and effort into shaping, painting and glassing it should realize that giving you a replacement blank doesn’t begin to compensate you one ioda and that they have committed a cardinal sin by making foam that causes gassing (delams).
There isn’t really any excuse for crooked stringers…sorry, but that’s the truth.
The statement that “our cell structure is uniform thru the entire blank” is pretty much b.s. and even harder for the foamers to prove…you want to state that? Let’s see THE PROOF.
As far as the wanting to get rid of your Walker blanks…there are probably quite a few people out there that will be happy to take them. I personally haven’t shaped Walker Foam in the past and heard negative statements about how they paint and very positive statements about how they shaped. All I can attest to is that I was given 2 Walker formulated blanks that was put thru the Ice 9 pouring equipment and it was the best foam I had ever shaped or some of the best over the last 3 decades. My experience was apparently very much like Terry Martin’s experience with Just Foam. I also painted the board (it painted excellent), glassed, and sanded the board out. In another thread I weighed the blank and digitally weighed it at every stage of it’s construction. (Somewhere in another thread…look around, you’ll find it).
BTW…I was told that Harold (Walker) tested quite a few foams for compression by using a ram and pressure gauge to see how easily they dented. He did this on the outside skin, then milled 1/4" off of each and tested, and so on. Some fared quite well where others dropped 40% to 70% of their skin strength…very revealing I would say. Some very popular user friendly blanks are also very weak, especially in the hands of shapers that weren’t around before close tolerance Clark blanks. So if they are doing full choke thicknessing off the deck to get closer to the bottom because they still are figuring out how to turn rails…er, good luck (I feel bad for their customers). It is a very strong advantage to have the ability to correctly restructure a blank when needed, and there aren’t that many of us left out there (sad to say).
So what do we shapers care about?
Price: (TDI blanks are petrocemically based & vulnerable to oil increase MDI are not)
Quality: (of foam, wood, rocker specs, servicing)
Delivery: (is my board ready yet? You gotta have the foam to make the board to get paid.)
Variety: of available blanks (if I can’t shape the dims outta yer blank, who else do I use?)
Blank density options: (proper weight for the board order. More dense/less glass or in reverse?)
Everyone has realities that vary and can differ greatly. To each their own.
Above all else… have fun shaping.