After being ghosted by yet another CNC Surfboard shaper several weeks ago, I decided to have a custom shaper use my Channel Fish template to make a Retro Fish. Not including the outline/template, resident shaper MRat shaped the rest of the board (rails, rocker, wings, etc.)
It’s headed to the glasser next.
I call it the E-Type Retro.
3” x 21.5” x 66”, tail width 13.5” inches with 6.75” butt crack.
Earlier photos to follow.
In the begininning,
I searched through more than a few fins before I found the Gephart 70:30 Keel twin (True Ames — Futures).
@stoneburner Nice to see that outline being used on a board by @Mrat
I imagine that you are pretty stoked!
@MRat has done a great job shaping it. Figured it was my only chance to get that outline in a high quality, rideable SB in time for my annual pilgrimage to the NC coast. Still have 4 Paipo-HP blanks and a slight design modification of the 42” Lord-Coanda hybrid in the queue.
The original template/outline for this build was part of a personal challenge to create an all math generated Coanda Channel SB design.
The template was Lis Fish inspired but used 2 basic equations for the curves. Fluid dynamics curve for the tail section. Basic math curve for the nose section. When I saw your CAD rendering of my data, I knew right away it was a shape I have been after for decades.
Thomas Vilmin (of Shape3D) IGES rendering of the @jrandy STL file.
The E-Type Retro has arrived.
It is a beauty — a keeper for sure. I tip my hat to @MRat ! No way I could have made something this nice even if I didn’t need it by June.
Totally stoked to ride it.
Afraid to put the fins in it tonight.
Will do it first thing tomorrow am.
Nice and clean, congrats to you and your team!
Your conversion of my design data to a CAD file made electronic transmission of an outline/template with precise curves possible.
Helo mr stoneburner,
i have a question for you?
first consider i am 173 cms tall and 77 kgs and i am an average everyday surfer in terms of talent and fisical condition.
i have a cole surfboard ( the american cole, not the french cole) and its a mb twin model that ressembles a lot to your design ( i know yours is unique, but mine ressembles) and my question is ( and i havent test drived mine yet) how did you arrived to the 21.5 wide measurement, because everytime i hold mine it almost doesn’t fit under my arm. And when i look at it, it looks like a lot of table top.
i also understand a fish should be 2 to 3 inches wider then your average shotboard but would really like to know your toughts behind your choice of the 21.5?
also if you need any more info on my board let me know.
cheers and good waves.
First, my objective was to put my take/spin on the first (Retro) Fish Steve Lis made for a stand-up surfer, Jeff Ching. That board was reported to be 21.5” x 65”. Steve’s first Fish kneeboard was reported to be 4’7” with similar width. Years ago, I found another Retro Fish surfboard template that 21.5” x 66”. I’ve been playing with Retro Fish design for many years.
Second, I wanted a board board that I could ride prone and arm paddle for take offs rather than use swim fins, if I wanted to. I also wanted the option of stand-up riding. To this day, Steve Lis says the Fish was designed to be a kneeboard. So I decided the first Lis Retro Fish stand-up board was the way to go: 21.5” x 65”-66”; widepoint 36”-37” from the wing tips. (BTW Steve Lis’ modern Fish surfboards sold at Bird’s Surf Shed are 21” wide for all boards 66” to 74” long.) All of my BB/Paipo prototypes are 22” wide.
Third, every 5-6 to 8-0 board I have built/bought new for the last 57 years has been 21” to 22” wide. My first 5-6 twin fin was 21.5” x 66”.
Fourth, as width increases, boards become more stable, less side-to-side rock (roll). IMO makes wave-catching/take-offs easier.
Fifth, but less significant at 66” long. Increasing width increases bottom surface area which reduces the speed required for planing.
BTW do you have link to the US made Cole MB Twin?
i will post pictures here of the board as soon as i am close to it.
cheers and good waves
