ever considered having a quad or bonzer 5 cluster on your fish? threads from as far back as 2005 were already chockful of testimonials on either setup as being “better” than the twin keel option, it’d be interesting to hear your take on that
What if your Buttcrack has a sidecrack or a dry spot? Or maybe a scar?
[/quote]
i think dencorub is called 'bengay' in your country ??!!
if you rub that on your buttcrack , that should prevent any further ...er.. "intrusions "... and "that will put the colour back in your cheeks ", as eric morecombe used to say
Anybody ever notice that a fish tail looks like a round tail split in half, quarter-circle curves (the tail rails) moved to the inside. Always figured it was a way to keep the round tail surface area and create a wider tail for better planing (keeping less actual surface area for a wider tail) and better tracking for hard cutbacks.
Haven’t built my variant yet, may never the way things are going at the moment. But NJ’s formula is very close to the formula I had decided to use – the Golden Ratio. Golden Ratio is roughly 60:40, actual is 61.8 to 38.2. I figured distance between tail tips should be 61.8% of max board width.
Seems like there is still a lot of exploring to do with the tail design variations and rail foil of fish tails.
not having had the chance yet to try a fish here in PH, what jumps at me looking at video footage of fishes & twin-pins in action is how a buttcrack effectively halves the tail for a practical reason, the inside curves of which mimic their opposite outside curves if the tail was conventionally shaped as a round pin or a diamond. now i’m not really sure how wrong this interpretation is but it looks to me like the reason for the reduction of planing area seems to be because in larger surf, wide tails tend to suck down, increasing the chances of a nosedive right after pop-up before any maneuver can be made to keep it from happening. by slitting the tail open which allows the tail to release better, early mishaps like this are then averted.
in which case, ratios commonly used for fish & swallow buttcracks lose their significance in shaping fishes once we consider the type of split-tailed boards that still work even if their buttcracks are no wider nor no deeper than 2 or 3 inches, far less than what typical fishes feature. either way, i’m still doing plenty of head-scratching on how deep or shallow i can comfortably slit the tail of my simmons-fish-bonzer HWS hybrid, and not regret it afterwards.