Z (and Ding)
Quality and…delivery. I’m in agreement with the innovation and quality comments by Z.
I’m comforted by SD’s response on codes for protection…you have to be skeptical about propriety in hard times. The ability to faithfully reproduce one of your own originals is a boon (good feature) to the shaper. Particularly a bonfide designer that puts counntless hours developing an original design. The ability to scale that design to varying sizes and to even change the design within the program is very attractive.
Grunt labor is grunt labor. I was explaining some history to a client yesterday about the difference between the earlier day shapers and someone that started after Clark implemented “close tolerance” blanks. The chief difference is the early day shapers know how to “read foam” and “restructure” a blank to create what they need from it. This ability netted a strong but light board. The inability to do so meant a board that was prone to dinging and/or delmainating esp. on the deck, and even boards that would be more susceptible to snapping.
Understanding this concept helped many early day shapers become credible designers. Let’s call it a mental exercise in understanding the parameters of what each blank inherently possessed. We learned to respect the blank. That may seem like a strange or esoteric statement, but the guys from my era will understand what this means.
In this new era of slick marketing, fifty thousand cutesy model names and neat logos, the ability to produce quality remains important to the surfers in the know. I don’t exclude surfers that are younger that still discern over getting a quality product, but I have to say that to a higher degree, the guys that are a bit older (I’m being kind here, dinosaurs) want and appreciate quality that much more. Sure, there will always be the type of person that wants cheap uses it, and throws it away, but a lot of the guys (and some women) that I shape for, want a great riding board that doesn’t disintegrate in 6 months.
Does this mean they must go to a hunk of EPS with PVC skins and paint jobs that chip? No. There is some terrific foam out there now; both in PU and EPS. The resin systems in boh polyester and epoxy have dramatically improved. I can make a ridiculously strong board with everyday materials w/o the hi tech price tag. So can many others if they desire to do so. This is up to the craftsman, but you have to care enough about what you make.
The chief problem for many…and I am surprised by this, given our current challenges, is the age old slow as a constipated turtle delivery that many guys still cop to. Also the many, many guys that are under the impression that they will make enough dough just shaping to equal a loaf of bread to feed themselves, their kid, or their goldfish for that matter. Some do, but that is the exception to the norm. How many of you shape at least 20 boards each and every week and net $50 per shape? This is just a basic guideline, of course everyone has different sets of expenses and needs.
Welcome to today. Market share is fought over like gladiators in ancient Rome. Branding is better than ever by people with deep pockets, income from alternative sources, along with bored execs that surf, and ttrustfunders…the list is endless. So out they come, in droves, new models that aren’t any different than it’s predessor (other than the new logo), constantly being introduced in mags and on the internet.
Fact: Each product goes through a cycle in it’s lifetime:
Introduction
Growth
Maturity
Decline
To avoid decline, the “New & Improved” is developed as a product reaches Maturity. Even if it is only new packaging on the same old bar of soap inside…“New & Improved Tide”?
So the bottom line here is to be innovative, treat your customers as individuals, charge a fair price, produce quality and DELIVER.
P.S.
…and if you are one of those guys that hates what China produces, promote GLASS ON FINS on everything you make…this will screw with them when it comes time to load the containers.