Hi Reverb,
Good questions. I've done them each of the ways that you describe. I found
that if the outline is completely asymmetric, the board can "crab" or goes at a slight angle
when going straight down the line. The opposite end of the asymmetry trip is just to tweak
the tail end (what I call "the business end") of the board. Fair gains are had depending on
how much the two tail templates diverge. A large gain was found when changing the lengths
of each, usually (but not always) results in a shorter backside/heelside rail. Credit Carl
with that rationale, and Maurice too, (the two of them together in the shop is something
to watch... ha ha)
The middle choice is what I've been doing a lot lately, asymmetric from the widepoint, aft.
And yes, the curves are different. For example, we took our favorite roundtail thruster
template and used it on one side, then our favorite wing/swallow on the other side. The
curvatures are different.
It gets deeper than that.
Seems a lot of attention is paid on the outline (perhaps the most obvious aspect of
asymmetrics,) but there are also the rocker line(s) and the rail shapes to be addressed.
What to do?
Build your two favorite boards basically and try it! The skill comes in blending the
two, eliminating the unnecessary and staying consistent with foil lines.
(I hope I'm not steering the thinking of anyone on here, the stuff described is NOT
the "be all, end all" of asymmetry, I have collaborated from established designers
and have taken things I thought might work. My guess is every thing I've put into
the A_Symm has all be done before, maybe not the exact combination but it's
all been done for sure. Yet there are a TON of other things to try. Lately, I've been
working on asymmetric rails as backside seems to like another rail compared to
frontside.
Hi Mr. J,
Just read your journey with getting the board to work, there are still options out there!
Don't give up. I've been working a bit with a local fin maker/designer Larry Gephart.
He is really into testing stuff, very methodical and precise. He says it best, every
perceived failure is a gain, "Well, that didn't work." Each session is learning, which has
inspired me many times when I got knocked back 3 steps- Sometimes knowing what
didn't work, is as valuable as knowing what does work if one takes a somewhat systematic
approach to things.
Well, you've done that mate. The rear fin is a HUGE discovery you made, by knowing
the set-up was NOT going to work with rear fin at center, you can deduce what will
work! Good stuff!
BTW, I sloped the (offset) center fin 1.5 degrees over to "favor" the round pin side.
The offset and tilt made for a lot of debate in our shop, it was a leap to do but got
rid of certain drag components/shockwaves (?) that normal set-ups have and ended
up working unreal.
Thanks for sharing your design push,
George