Since I’m making one, I’ve been poking through the archives. I see a lot of definitions. I’ve seen some pretty wild criteria. Even to the point of folks specifying whether or not the fins are glassed on and whether the board’s done in volan.
Best I can figure the major design elements are a forward wide point, no center fin, and a sizable swallow tail. Without those it doesn’t seem like the board would ride like a fish. Ironically, the swallow tail seems to be the most trivial of those three elements to the design…
The board pictured I’d assume is a thruster. The widepoint appears to be behind center. I think many wouldn’t consider it a fish.
I had a friend who bought a model with ‘fish’ in the name recently. The shaper told him that he calls anything with a swallow tail a ‘fish’ because it sells boards lately
My humble offering to this post is to note that keel fins (double foiled) appear to be a key design element of a “traditional” fish . . . I’ve recently started riding a board (Hank Warner) with foiled keel fins (smaller profile, not traditional) and have been very intrigued by the holding power.
Along with everything on Lob’s list, the name comes from the widepoint-forward shape. “Fishform” boats & kayaks have been around, and so-called, for hundreds of years.
Here is a picture of a board that i made i few months ago. I thought it was just a thruster but every one that has seen it goes “oh yeah thats a sweet looking fish you got there”. i have allways thought that a fish was wide point forward, wider, no center fin and a but crack.
Fish are exotherms(in general). Live and reproduce in water. Half bodies covered with scales(in general). Are vertebrates. All respirate through gills. Come on. Most of us REALLy know what a fish is. The rest just like to quibble. Nice swallow tails, by the way. Mike