hey beardman just some thoughts (a lot could be wrong and are just my opinions/plans/you cant stop me!)
pour foam too heavy, wood too heavy
not interested in spoons over 6.5 lbs
trying new lam schedule
shaped it already, just an old 2.5 lb eps, and left the blank raw thickness on deck, but 4 inches in from each rail basically finished the typical spoon deck rail foil, but rippin off dvs style full tubular rails with edge more drastic than black beauty style but less than greeno psychoticness, full velo has too narrow an operating range for the 438th time
butcher paper tape off both deck and bottom as if doing a cutlap, leaving the foam exposed for the apex (thickest part) of the deck rail, wrapping around to about about 3 inches in on the bottom
glass 3 layers of 4 oz carbon around each rail (7/8 length of board, going all the way out tail) , trim as if double cutlap, glass 2 full layers with laps 4 oz s-glass bottom.
grind deck.
top lam schedule: 2 layers 4 oz s-glass just where pure knee section will be, overlapping the inner part of already done rail laps a half inch or something
maybe one 3/4 length (all the way out the tail) 4 oz s-glass
maybe some roving to blend the foam to pure lam
for sure 2 full layers with laps 4 oz carbon on deck to encapsulate and blendify it all
hopefully 6 pounds with rigid flex rails and super twist knee lam part,
the difficult part is flowing the strength to minimize stress risers
edit - more possibly wrong ramblings, but it will be fun to break it in a turn
also john the perimeter stringers are great ideas dont need much maybe just like 3/32" thick balsa long grain following the horseshoe perimeter an inch in from the outside each foam rail
i once horrifically/possibly maniacally embedded 1/8 inch balsa stringers in the rear 2/3s of 8 lb pour foam, center of rail (thickest part) and it broke up front of it, board was 6.5 lbs and too stiff in the rail portions that contained the embedded stringers
the labor required would be difficult to muster the motivation to do it right tho, and they must go nose to tail to keep forces flowing, as we all know abrupt endage (or changeage) of carbon or stringas is gonna be the weakness
good luck beardman and remember the only thing that can actually quantify and explain the complexity of spoons and mats is the intro to norma jeans face:face!, or possibly the song nirvana by tom waits or ‘floater’ by every time i die, good luck