Hey Lee,
Thanks for the input and the postive energy.
Lee, I will try and discribe what you are feeling in order to get you up to warp 7 or so. The fins I’ve made for you don’t interfere with the way the board performs rather they allow it to shift with very little obstruction. Deceleration is minumized by the fin foil pattern, cant, and outline. The drive they deliver is in a power curve that is intended to approach the power curve of that available in the wave face. Speed is the constant that affects this curve. Fin power and board speed are intended to somewhat mirror eachother. This sort of perfromance curve allows the surfer to get in the sweet spot on the board and seek the most potentially powerful part of the wave face. When you hit on where these fins work best on the Pescado, the Edge or what ever board they happen to light up take a photo for us mate. It’ll help more than just you and I see how fin set-ups can be placed to max out performance.
Note: Consider that the reason surfers have to pump for speed is because some fins in use today obstruct the maximum trim speed of a board – thus a surfer has the illusion that he is making more progress than he really is. (God forbide that the marketing realm would pull wool over the eyes of the consumer) With each pump the board squirts forward only to begin decelerating the moment one of the rail fins isn’t engaged and “paddling” the board forward. During each rail change the board decelerates. Watch someone surfing on a modern shortboard and tell me if the board isn’t descelerating or accelerating constantly. Move the wide point back on a board and this performance picture is accentuated.
If fins are balanced to the way a board performs best they well let the surfer reach the limits of speed and board performance in given set of conditions. They will allow the surfer to seek what ever part of the wave face is choosen more freely because less deceleration occurs and one is more able to drive toward limits of a board’s performance peak at speed.
Go faster, drive harder ~ I.E. more power available – more fin lift available – more acceleration available, and when going slower, drive less ~ I.E. less power, less fin lift amd seek as much trim speed as possible.
Fins and boards that are more effecient take less effort to make them accelerate and the hold their speed better too. Sharp round house cutbacks are done much more easily when fins loosen up as the board slows down and it’s great to be able to cut back without massive deceleration. One can always stall a board by moving off the sweet spot. It doesn’t make any difference whether you move forward (classic longboard noseriding) or rock back (modern shortboard technique) the board will slow down either way.
What I’m attempting to engineer into fin set-ups are ones that allow surfers to reach the top end of a board performance range. Board configuration posssibilities are infinite; fins must follow. IMHO the best way to generate more speed is with rail fin drive. Boards with out rail fins don’t generate speed as well as those that have them. There is a trend with us at present the speaks to amplifying rail fin power with twinzer and quad set-ups that has significant merit. It works on boards of lengths up to 9.6" very well because taking the center fin out reduces drag. I’ve seen many boards in action and ones with minimal center fins or without any at all seem to trim the fastest. I believe this is why we are seeing more fish type shapes. These kind of set-ups have evolved from the tradional fish which IMHO was truely one of the greatest advancements in performance surfing.
If you haven’t ridden one take a Skip Fry, Rich Pavel, John Mel, Ward Coffey, Hap Jacobs, or Carl Olson traditional fish creation for a spin. They sure are fun, are quite fast and real smoooooth to.
Looks like we have a little south and some northwest swell on the way.
Share the Stoke, Rich