Checked this article on Surfline and thought slide 32/37 would be relevant to start a discussion on how short of a board is it possible to surf on large waves. Apparently he was riding a 5’11". I know Kelly Slater does it. Jamie O’brien rides a 6’2" at fairly heavy Pipeline. Obviously skill is the number one factor in the equation…
http://www.surfline.com/surf-news/mid-winter-wonderland-swell-story_91023/
I was thinking about bottom rocker today and how it affects the two stroke under the lip take off on short boards being surfed in overhead to double overhead tubes and then I see this Surfline feature.
What do you guys think is better (besides a proper mini gun):
-Continual curve rocker?
-Staged Rocker?
…and what curve?:
-Aggressive nose gradually lowering to a lower tail rocker?
-Lower nose rocker to a gradually increasing tail rocker starting somewhere in the middle of the board without flipping in the tail?
-Same as above but with some kick at the end of the tail?
-other???
For the sake of discussion, lets keep board length between 5’11" and 6’3", regular round pin (not to pulled in), “high performance thruster shortboard” outline (Example: 11"-12" nose, 18 1/2" - 19 " center, 13 1/2" - 14 1/2" tail).
Finally, where would you put the wide point in relation the the selected rocker combination?
*Optional: Any other factors such as: (Vs or type of concaves, rails, foil in relation to rocker) you may want to mention into the equation of such a board?
Please focus the discussion on the main varable in question:** rocker**. Although I know that a board is not dependant on a single element but a combination of all…