If Lokbox or Futures was owned by a bank with bottomless pockets, that doesn't mind giving product away at an alarming rate, or paying people off to put boards with said product into tradeshow booths, FCS would be history by now.
Thus highlighting the difference between being in the market first, and trying to make up marketshare against someone else. It is definitely perceived as unfair to those entering the business later. It is perceived as reality to people familiar with developing and mature markets.
That being said they are losing market share by the day.
I’m not sure about this. FCS seems to be losing US domestic manufacturing market share for sure. But that is a stable or shrinking market. They seem to be dominating the import market which is growing by leaps and bounds.
FCS does have a lot of competition, most of them engineered better, but FCS makes good business moves for the most part. And in business if you are currently on top, by a long margin, you don’t really have to make that many good moves to keep the business going well.
Lightest is argueable at best, and with around 13 steps to install, easiest to install is argueable as well.
The fact is that FCS is readily installed with just a drill, no router needed. No matter how much you engineer a router install, it will still be tougher than the FCS install.
For that matter, Futures requires a single constant depth routed line. It is literally as easily as possible for a router install. And it is done by the shapers, which the glass shops LOVE, because that saves them the time of installation. Time is money. The shaper does it in 5-10 minutes per board. That fact has a lot of shapers and glass shops using Futures as their first choice, because human labor hours are the most expensive variable in surfboard production.
Was in Epoxy pro yesterday and noticed very few if any FCS boards in there. Just a matter of time, but i'm no hurry for the race to the bottom. I've set out to develop something better, and more reliable, and I think I've done just that. If your main criterias for using a fin system is availability or ease of repair that's pretty sad. I'm concerned with performance. If it's designed well repair isn't much of an issue.
I was speaking about the market and how the market reacts, not how I react. Availability and ease of repair DO matter to surfers. It is hard to claim a REAL performance advantage when most surfers see Kelly Slater in FCS ads and note he has won multiple world titles ONLY surfing FCS. That alone will make it VERY difficult for any other fin company to argue they have a performance advantage.
The fact that FCS installs with just a drill makes it very difficult for other fin companies to claim they have an installation advantage.
The fact that FCS plugs are tiny and weigh next to nothing makes it hard for other fin companies to claim they have a weight advantage (even though they may use more resin that others and don’t have a real weight advantage).
FCS is not on top for no reason. They care a lot about what makes their business work. And they attend to that.