then having no choice but to ride his 6’3…and realizing how much better the 6’3 worked cuz the board ‘fit’ the wave face better
That’s an intersting comment because I’ve heard it before. Matching the boards curves to the waves to fit it instead of fighting it. Granted I surf in Florida not Chopes, but I’ve found that I’ve been much happier going with a smaller board for smaller waves. I’ve got a 6’4" for when it’s good (rarely, here) and a 6’0 that is pretty much my standard these days, and a 5’10 for weak grovelly surf. As they get shorter they get wider and fuller noses to help plane earlier.
I’ve keep dropping size off the smallest board, it went from a pretty full-railed 6’2" x 2.5" thick, to more foiled rail 5’10" x 2.25" thick. I’m thinking the next one either going 5’8 and even thinner rails or getting it in EPS and do a 5’10" with a nicely concaved deck.
I’ve definately found a correlation to increased width compensating for decreased volume. The whole idea seems counter-intuitive but it seems to work. As is mentioned you’re not so much “catching” the wave as you are being picked up by it.